Table 5 The optimal RDG investment option of DGOs and LAs
Agents | RDG type | The location and capacity (MW) of RDG assets | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Case1 | Case 2 | Case3 | ||
DGOs | PV | 10 (0.4) | 5 (1) | 5 (1) |
16 (0.2) | 8 (0.6) | 10 (1) | ||
32 (1) | 9 (0.2) | 16 (1) | ||
33 (1) | 10 (1) | 20 (0.4) | ||
39 (0.4) | 16 (1) | 31 (0.6) | ||
50 (1) | 20 (0.2) | 32 (0.4) | ||
| Â | 31 (0.4) | 33 (1) | ||
| Â | 32 (0.4) | 37 (0.6) | ||
| Â | 33 (1) | 38 (1) | ||
| Â | 37 (0.6) | 39 (0.6) | ||
| Â | 38 (1) | 50 (0.4) | ||
| Â | 39 (0.6) | Â | ||
WTG | 1 (1) | 1 (0.1) | 1 (0.2) | |
8 (1) | 8 (1) | 8 (1) | ||
26 (1) | 32 (1) | 32 (1) | ||
27 (1) | 33 (1) | 33 (1) | ||
32 (0.2) | 49 (0.6) | 49 (0.5) | ||
33 (1) | 50 (0.3) | 50 (0.33) | ||
34 (1) | Â | Â | ||
35 (0.9) | Â | Â | ||
36 (0.9) | Â | Â | ||
40 (1) | Â | Â | ||
41 (0.7) | Â | Â | ||
49 (0.3) | Â | Â | ||
53 (1) | Â | Â | ||
LA | PV | – | 3 (0.4) | 3 (0.4) |
| Â | 4 (0.6) | 4 (0.6) | ||
| Â | 7 (0.4) | 7 (0.4) | ||
| Â | 9 (0.6) | 9 (0.6) | ||
| Â | 26 (0.6) | 26 (0.6) | ||
| Â | 28 (0.4) | 28 (0.4) | ||
| Â | 36 (0.2) | 36 (0.2Â s) | ||