Skip to main content

Table 8 Summary of investigated MGs in North America

From: Comparative framework for AC-microgrid protection schemes: challenges, solutions, real applications, and future trends

MG project

Country

Voltage level (kV)

Mode of operation

Load (MWA)

DERs types and ratings (technical characteristics)

Protection scheme

Grid-connected

Islanded

PV

ESS

Diesel

Fuel cell

Wind

Hydro

Steam

Gas

Electric Power Board MG

USA

12.47

✓

✓

NR*

1.3 MW

*

NR

     

SEL-751 protection

IntelliRupter (directional overcurrent protection)

Santa Rita Jail MG

USA

12.47

✓

✓

6.6

1.2 MW

4 MWh

2.4 MW

1 MW

11.5 kW

   

Over-/Under- voltage

Over-/Under- frequency

Directional overcurrent

Illinois Institute of Technology MG

USA

4.16

✓

✓

12

300 kW

500 kWh

4 MW

 

8

    

kW

  

8 MW

Hierarchical scheme

Over-/Under- voltage, Over-/Under- frequency, and Directional overcurrent

Differential protection

Adaptive overcurrent protection

Traditional overcurrent protection

          

Borrego Springs MG

USA

12

✓

✓

4.6

700 kW

1.5 MWh

3.6 MW

     

Voltage-restrained overcurrent protection

Guásimas del Metate MG

Mexico

0.22

 

✓

NR

45.9 kW

       

Inverters’ self-protection

Undervoltage protection

Voltage balance protection

Volts-hertz protection

Tierra Blanca del Picacho MG

Mexico

0.22

 

✓

NR

45.9 kW

       

Inverters’ self-protection

Undervoltage protection

Voltage balance protection

Volts-hertz protection

British Columbia Hydro MG

Canada

25

✓

✓

3

     

14 MW

  

Adaptive overcurrent protection

British Columbia Institute of Technology MG

Canada

12.47

✓

✓

17.9

300 kW

550 kWh

  

10 kW

 

250 kW

 

Differential protection

  1. *NR Not Reported in references, : Not installed(provided) in this MG