From: A systematic review of real-time detection and classification of power quality disturbances
Set of techniques | Advantages | Disadvantages | Application | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Multiple PQDs | Sags | Notches | ||||||
Refs | % | Refs | % | Refs | % | |||
Segmentation | Isolation of relevant data The reduced computational burden for subsequent stages | Thresholds required Subjective isolation for simultaneous PQDs Additional equipment/processing required | [38, 42, 44, 47, 57, 59, 61, 63, 69, 72, 75, 76, 81, 89, 97, 99, 101, 108, 124, 128, 130] | 21 | 11 | 28 | ||
Denoising/filtering | 6 | 5 | 16 | |||||
Normalization | Amplitude-independent techniques Thresholds in the percentage of the original signal | Interpretation of results is relative Loss of real-signal amplitude features | [42, 48, 50, 54, 55, 58, 59, 64, 68,69,70,71,72, 74, 76, 80,81,82, 88, 91,92,93, 97, 98, 101, 103, 108,109,110,111, 115, 119, 120, 122] | 34 | [140, 141, 143, 144, 146,147,148, 150, 152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159, 161, 162, 164,165,166, 168, 181, 182] | 44 | 8 |