Table 5 Statistical analysis for case 2 of the IEEE 30 bus system
From: Impact of the penetration of distributed generation on optimal reactive power dispatch
Algorithm | Best (MW) | Worst (MW) | Mean (p.u.) | Standard deviation (std.) | % of Power save | Average computation time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C-PSO [34] | 4.68017 | 5.69149 | 5.14339 | 2.8854 × 10− 3 | 17.3114 | 45.67 |
CI-PSO [34] | 4.61244 | 4.87635 | 4.64732 | 5.834 × 10− 4 | 18.5081 | 56.76 |
LDI-PSO [34] | 4.61243 | 4.93822 | 4.62908 | 4.851 × 10− 4 | 18.5083 | 49.57 |
B-DE [34] | 4.61243 | 4.61333 | 4.61281 | 2.6 × 10− 6 | 18.5083 | 46.78 |
R-DE [34] | 4.66755 | 4.98274 | 4.75088 | 6.54 × 10− 4 | 17.5344 | 54.07 |
SFLA [34] | 4.61483 | 4.97653 | 4.72213 | 9.973 × 10− 4 | 18.4659 | 41.97 |
NMSFLA [34] | 4.61181 | 4.61749 | 4.61264 | 9.8 × 10− 6 | 18.5192 | 23.06 |
ICA [34] | 4.6155 | 4.6624 | 4.6397 | 2.7613 × 10− 3 | 18.4541 | 68.14 |
IWO [34] | 4.6287 | 4.9206 | 4.7813 | 3.1584 × 10− 2 | 18.2208 | 70.45 |
MICA-IWO [34] | 4.5984 | 4.6009 | 4.5991 | 8.006 × 10− 6 | 18.7562 | 69.04 |
PSO | 4.7915 | 4.9387 | 4.9053 | 9.08 × 10−3 | 15.3445 | 50.73 |
R-PSO | 4.7392 | 5.0006 | 4.8695 | 8.707 × 10−3 | 16.2686 | 50.75 |
L-PSO | 4.8655 | 5.0222 | 4.9496 | 5.1176 × 10−3 | 14.0371 | 48.53 |
PSO-CFA | 4.7282 | 4.9185 | 4.8334 | 6.668 × 10−3 | 16.4629 | 50.63 |
IPSO-SR | 4.719 | 4.9316 | 4.84455 | 6.668 × 10−3 | 16.6254 | 51.13 |
FOA | 6.2775 | 6.3832 | 6.3605 | 5.3887 × 10−3 | −10.9099 | 49.28 |
MFOA | 5.0957 | 5.1424 | 5.13425 | 1.724 × 10−3 | 9.97 | 52.79 |
JAYA | 4.5983 | 4.5986 | 4.5984 | 9.4281 × 10−5 | 18.7579 | 50.44 |