Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems

Table 2 Comparison of Performance improvement of PIDD-PI over PID, PI-PD and PD-PID controllers

From: Cascade controller based modeling of a four area thermal: gas AGC system with dependency of wind turbine generator and PEVs under restructured environment

Response	Controllers				% Improvement of PIDD-PI over
Response	PID	PI-PD	PD-PID	PIDD-PI	PID	PI-PD	PD-PID
∆F₁ Figure 3a
POS	0.0230	–	–	0.0060	73.91	NA	NA
PUS	0.0600	0.0620	0.0670	0.0500	16.67	19.35	25.37
ST	34.160	24.190	35.160	11.060	67.62	53.86	68.44
∆P_tie14 Figure 3b
POS	0.0056	0.0070	0.0070	0.0060	NA	14.28	14.28
PUS	0.0024	0.0013	0.0039	0.0002	91.67	64.61	94.87
ST	36.000	16.150	36.080	15.250	57.63	5.9	57.73
∆P_tie34 Figure 3c
POS	0.0154	0.0170	0.0070	0.0140	90.09	17.64	50
PUS	0.0014	0.0010	0.0170	0.0010	28.57	Equal	94.11
ST	25.140	26.840	33.930	20.100	25.07	25.11	68.80

Bold representes the best values obtained with PIDD - PI controller when compared with the other comtrollers tabulated such as PID, PI-PD, PD-PID

Back to article page