Skip to main content

Table 2 A comparison among different techniques used to detect DFIG rotor faults

From: Internal electrical fault detection techniques in DFIG-based wind turbines: a review

References

Techniques

Advantages

Limitations

[71]

Magnetic equivalent circuit

High accuracy

Affected by the geometry of the machine

[76,77,78,79, 84, 88, 95, 97, 98]

Fourier analysis

High accuracy

Affected by the change of speed and torque

[81, 82, 89, 90, 96, 100, 102]

Wavelet analysis

High accuracy

Time consuming

[74, 75, 85]

Coupled-circuit

On-line

Affected by the geometry of the machine

[86, 87, 99]

Luenberger observer

Reduced computation time

Sensitive to any abnormality

[91,92,93]

Sequence component

On-line

Unable to detect the fault location

[101]

Support vector machine

Robust

Require expert opinion

[105, 106]

Power spectrum

Discriminate load oscillation

Applicable to low-frequency oscillation

[94, 107, 108]

Magnetic flux

Identify fault location

Requires additional sensors

[109, 110]

Vibration

On-line and simple

Requires additional sensors