A review of single phase adaptive auto-reclosing schemes for EHV transmission lines

Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems

Table 1 Summary of local end data based ASPAR schemes

Method	Transmission system	Reclosing time	Inputs	Remarks	Reference
ACUSUM	Uncompensated	4 ms	Faulted phase voltages	Simple, easy and much faster than others	[19]
ACUSUM	Uncompensated	–	Faulted phase voltages	Inclusion of deionization delay is good however practical system is not discussed	[24]
DFT & THD	Uncompensated	20 ms	Faulted phase voltages	No time localization of the fault, little bit slower	[16]
PRONY signal analysis	Shunt compensated	–	Current present in shunt reactor	Higher values of voltages may extend the time for secondary arc to extinguish	[33]
DFT & THD	Uncompensated	8 ms	Zero sequence voltages	Short reclosing time but noise can disrupt the calculations	[17]
WPT	Shunt compensated	5 ms	Faulted phase voltages	Faster and provides both time and frequency localization of the fault	[38]
Numerical Algorithm	Shunt compensated	0.7 s	Faulted phase voltages	Need a lot of mathematical computation	[34]
Power spectrum analysis	Shunt compensated	–	Recovery voltages	Simple and easy to implement	[35]
ADALINE	Uncompensated	–	Faulted phase voltage signal	Easy to determine fault nature. However practical system is not discussed	[25]
WT & ANFIS	Uncompensated	270 ms	Faulted phase voltage signal	An intelligent fault classifier based on pattern recognition	[18, 19, 40]