Optimal economic operation of isolated community microgrid incorporating temperature controlling devices
 Bo Hu^{1}Email author,
 He Wang^{1} and
 Sen Yao^{1}
DOI: 10.1186/s4160101700371
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 24 August 2016
Accepted: 7 February 2017
Published: 10 March 2017
Abstract
With the increasing connection of controllable devices to isolated community microgrid, an economic operation model of isolated community microgrid based on the temperature regulation characteristics of temperature controlling devices composed of wind turbine, microgas turbine, energy storage battery and heat pump is proposed. With full consideration of various economic costs, including fuel cost, startstop cost, energy storage battery depletion expense and penalty for wind curtailment, the model is solved by hybrid particle swarm optimization (HPSO) algorithm. The optimal output of the microsources and total operating cost of the system in the scheduling cycle are also obtained. The case study demonstrates that temperature adjustment of temperature controlling devices can adjust the power load indirectly and increase the schedulability of the isolated community microgrid, and reduce the operating cost of the microgrid.
Keywords
Isolated community microgrid Temperature controlling devices Economic operation Energy storage system1 Introduction
To solve the increasingly prominent energy crisis and environmental problems, microgrid that can accept various renewable energy sources has been developed [1–5]. However, renewable energy sources (e.g. wind energy and solar energy) in the microgrid and connection of controllable loads at the demand side have brought new challenges to microgrid scheduling and operation. The community microgrid has complicated electrical and thermal relationships due to the abundant temperature controlling devices. Therefore, adequate scheduling is the prerequisite of optimal economic operation of the community microgrid incorporating temperature controlling devices.
Optimal economic operation of microgrid is to properly allocate the output of microsources to increase the economic benefits of the microgrid. Many related researches have been reported. Based on the new photovoltaic output model, Reference [6] formed a probability sequence of windsolar collaborative output through the convolution method and established a microgrid optimal economic operation model that can convert stochastic constraint into certainty constraints. The microgrid optimal economic operation model established in [7] took the impact of the electricity market into account and by optimizing the outputs of different microsources it reduced power fluctuation of the power lines and the total operating costs. Reference [8] put forward a multiobjective fuzzy adaptive HPSO algorithm to optimize the microgrid operation. It converted the multiple objective functions of power supply cost, environmental pollution expenses and generating cost into a single objective through the proposed algorithm. Reference [9] established a model for energy storage charge–discharge loss and incorporated it into the microgrid economic operation model to analyze its effect on the economic operation of the microgrid. In Reference [10], considering the energy storage characteristics, electric/heat load and timeofuse (TOU) power price, it proposed an economic operation model for regional connected microgrid that uses electricityheat combined scheduling. References [11–16] considered the connection of renewable energy sources into the cogeneration microgrid and the impacts of the characteristics of renewable energy power generation equipment and load randomness on optimal operation of the microgrid to optimize the outputs of different microsources, in order to achieve the lowest economic cost.
Based on the literature, it is found that existing researches on economic operation of microgrid mainly focus on two aspects. One studies the problems caused by volatility and intermittence of renewable energy power generation units in the microgrid and the other considers diversified energy demands in the microgrid and establishes optimal economic operation models for cogeneration microgrid through independent or combined scheduling of the electric and heat systems.
However, few researches have discussed the influences of temperature controlling devices at the load side on the economic operation of microgrid. Electrical loads can be adjusted indirectly through the temperature adjustment characteristics of the temperature controlling devices, thus increasing the schedulability of the microgrid.
This paper establishes an optimal economic operation model for community microgrid incorporating temperature controlling devices with wind turbine, microgas turbine, energy storage battery and heat pump. With full consideration of various economic costs, including fuel cost, startstop cost, energy storage battery depletion expenses, and penalty for wind curtailment, the model is solved by hybrid particle swarm optimization (HPSO) algorithm to achieve the optimal economic benefit. The case study validates that temperature adjustment of temperature controlling devices can reduce operating cost of the community microgrid.
2 Mathematical models for common units in the microgrid
2.1 Structure of the community microgrid
2.2 WT output model
For distributed renewable energy generations, wind power technology is the most mature and widely used one. Due to the intermittence, randomness and instability of wind energy, WT output is influenced by meteorological factors, such as wind speed. However, the relationship between WT output and wind speed is not a simple linear one. According to many researches, WT output is related to terrain, wake effect and wind power output loss. To simplify WT output, existing studies have revealed that it is closely related to the actual wind speed of the moment. Through analyzing wind speed and WT output, it was found that WT output can be determined by the cutin wind speed, cutout wind speed and rated wind speed.
2.3 MT output model
where P _{ MT }(t) and G _{ MT }(t) are the generated output and natural gas consumption of MT during the moment t; q is the heat value of natural gas; η _{ e } is the generating efficiency of MT during the moment t.
where C _{CH4} is the price of natural gas.
2.4 Charge–discharge model of the energy storage system
With increasing renewable energy sources (e.g. WT and PV) connected to the microgrid, energy storage unit which can effectively smooth renewable energy sources output and ensure reliable operation of the microgrid has become an important component. When there is renewable energy output surplus, the energy storage unit can store surplus energy to reduce wind and PV curtailment. When there is insufficient power supply, the energy storage unit can provide stable power output to the loads.
Energy storage can generally be divided into physical energy storage and chemical energy storage. Typical physical energy storage includes pumped storage, superconducting energy storage and flywheel energy storage, whereas typical chemical energy storage includes accumulator energy storage and capacitor energy storage.
Among the different energy storages, accumulator is superior to others and has been extensively used because of its low cost, stable performance, long service life and deep charge–discharge operations. During microgrid operation, state of charge (SOC) of the energy storage system can be expressed as follows [18].
where S _{ oc }(t + 1) and S _{ oc }(t) are the SOC of the leadacid battery at t + 1 and t, respectively; \( {P}_t^{\mathrm{c}} \) and \( {P}_t^{\mathrm{d}} \) are the charge and discharge power of the leadacid battery at t; η _{ c } and η _{ d } are the charging and discharging efficiencies of the leadacid battery; Δt is the simulation time interval (1 h in this paper); and C _{ bat } is the capacity of the leadacid battery.
3 Simulation model of typical temperature controlling devices
3.1 Equivalent model of temperature controlling devices
Community microgrid has to consider simultaneous supply of electricity and heat (temperature controlled). Typical temperature controlling devices have heat storage capacity, such as heat pump, air conditioner, water heater, etc.
In this paper, heat pump is chosen as the typical temperature controlling device. From the perspective of increasing absorption of clean energy sources, energy storage system and heat pump both store surplus energy and have similar functions. With respect to implementation, energy storage systems store surplus renewable power directly, while heat pump transforms surplus renewable power into heat energy.
Generally speaking, electricity storage has high cost and its service life can be shortened during the charge–discharge process. In contrast, heat pump has good economic benefits due to its lower investment and maintenance cost, though with higher energy consumption. Moreover, it is equipped with temperature adjustment that can adjust the total electrical load in the microgrid.
In western developed countries, temperature controlling devices like heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system, water heater and refrigerator make great proportions of the total load. They have good energy storage characteristics and potentially can replace some energy storage devices in the microgrid [19].
In Figs. 3 and 4, C _{ a } and C _{ m } are the specific heat capacity of air and solids (J/°C), respectively; Q is the thermal power of the HVAC system (W); UA is the standby thermal loss coefficient (W/°C); R _{1} equals to 1/UA and R _{2} equals to 1/UA _{ mass }; T _{ o }, T _{ i } and T _{ m } are the ambient temperature, indoor air temperature and the temperature of indoor solid matters (°C), respectively.
where T _{ room } is the indoor temperature (°C); C and R are the equivalent thermal capacitance (J/°C) and thermal resistance (°C/W), respectively; Q is the thermal power (W); T _{ o } is the outdoor ambient temperature (°C); t is the simulation time and Δt is the simulation step size.
This ETP model keeps the main characteristics of the thermodynamic changes of the heat pump. When temperature exceeds the given upper and lower limits, the heat pump is started and begins to consume power to adjust the temperature changes, transforming electric energy into heat energy. When temperature is within the upper and lower limits, the heat pump is turned off and temperature changes naturally. This paper also employs this simplified ETP model as the simulation model of temperature controlling devices.
3.2 Operation strategy of microgrid incorporating temperature controlling devices
 ①
Satisfy demands for general power load in the operation period.
 ②
Judge whether indoor temperature in this operation period is within the adjustment range. If yes, do not start the temperature controlling devices; otherwise, turn on the temperature controlling devices. These temperature controlling devices are under centralized control and indoor temperature is determined according to ambient temperature and the simulation model. Finally, power load in the community microgrid during the operation period is determined.
 ③
Microsources scheduling is adjusted according to optimized time series load power. Renewable energy power generation is used firstly, and is followed by traditional generator sets.
4 Optimal economic operation model of community microgrid incorporating temperature controlling devices
4.1 Objective function
where \( {P}_t^w \) is the WT generated output, which can be calculated from the WT output model according to the forecasted wind speed; \( {P}_t^{wa} \) is the available WT output for the microgrid; N _{ T } is the charge–discharge cycles of the energy storage system in the scheduling period, and N _{ k } the maximum charge–discharge cycles of the leadacid battery [9]; E _{ in } is the investment of energy storage devices in the microgrid.
4.2 Model constraints
The microgrid incorporating temperature controlling devices mainly has to meet power load balance during the operation.
where P _{ wt } and P _{ mt } are the WT and MT output power, respectively; \( {P}_{ess}^{dis} \) and \( {P}_{ess}^{ch} \) are the discharge and charge power of the energy storage system, respectively; P _{ l } is the general power load in the microgrid and P _{ hp } the demanded power of the heat pump.
where T _{ set } is the set temperature and δ the temperature adjustment range after temperature comfort of users being taken into account.
where \( {P}_{mt}^{min} \) is the allowed minimum output when MT is turned on and \( {P}_{mt}^{max} \) the allowed maximum output when MT is turned off.
where \( {P}_{hp}^{min} \) and \( {P}_{hp}^{max} \) are the allowed minimum and maximum power when the heat pump is turned on.
⑤ Constraint of the energy storage system
where Soc _{min} and Soc _{max} are the minimum and maximum SOC of the energy storage system, respectively.
where Soc(1) and Soc(T) are the SOC of the energy storage system at the beginning and end of scheduling period respectively. Soc _{initial} is the set SOC of the energy storage system at the initial scheduling period.
5 Solving method of the model
5.1 Principle of HPSO algorithm
Traditional PSO algorithm has been improved in existing researches and a hybrid particle swarm optimization (HPSO) algorithm was proposed [22]. To enrich diversity of particles, crossing and mutation operations in genetic algorithm have been introduced into qualified particles, which avoids local optimal convergence and increases the success rate of searching the optimal solution.
where X _{1} and X _{2} are the positions of parent particles; \( {X}_{{}_1}^{\hbox{'}} \) and \( {X}_{{}_2}^{\hbox{'}} \) are the positions of offspring particles after the crossing operation; rand is a random number between [0,1]; V _{1} and V _{2} are the speeds of parent particles; \( {V}_1^{\hbox{'}} \) and \( {V}_2^{\hbox{'}} \) are the speeds of offspring particles after the crossing operation.
Mutation mainly decreases the convergence of particle swarm, maintains diversified feasible solutions and avoids local optimal convergence. Particles for mutation are chosen randomly according to given mutation probability.
5.2 Steps of the solving method based on HPSO algorithm

Step1: input parameters of the microsources, wind speed, temperature and load. Forecast output power of WT, load and ambient temperature.

Step2: set parameters of HPSO. Initialize the position and speed of particles, and produce the initial particle swarm.

Step3: according to the generated outputs and loads of the microsources, adjust the microsource power and the energy storage system to meet the constraints of load balance and output.

Step4: calculate fitness value. The above objective function is used as the fitness value: fitness = F.

Step5: update the speeds and positions of particles. Meanwhile, the optimal personal particle and optimal global particle are updated according to the calculated fitness value.

Step6: implement the crossing and mutation operations. New particle of personal optimal crossing is gained through crossing of the personal best particles. New particle of global optimal crossing is gained through crossing of the personal best particles and global best particles. Particle mutation refers to getting new particles through mutation by themselves.

Step7: judge whether iterations have reached the preset number. If not, turn to step 3; otherwise, turn to step 8.

Step 8: end the cyclical iteration and output the global optimum and the optimal particle position. These are the optimal economic cost and outputs of the microsources and the energy storage system during the scheduling period.
6 Case study
6.1 Brief introduction to the example
Data of the Micro turbines
Type  Power(kW)  Amount  

up  down  
MT1  20  70  1 
MT2  10  50  1 
Data of the WT
Type  Power (kW)  v _{ ci }  v _{ co }  v _{ r }  Amount  

up  down  (m/s)  (m/s)  (m/s)  (m/s)  
WT  0  30  3  25  15  2 
Parameters of the heat pumps
Type  P _{ max }(kW)  P _{ min }(kW)  P _{ r }(kW)  Amount 

HP  10  3  6  5 
Data of the battery
Type  Power(kW)  S _{ oc } _{ min } (kWh)  S _{ oc } _{ max } (kWh)  η _{ c }  η _{ d }  

P _{ chmax }  P _{ dismax }  
leadacid battery  40  40  48  160  0.95  0.95 
6.2 Example analysis
① Optimal economic operation of the microgrid without temperature adjustment
It can be seen from Fig. 8 that:
1) Based on known parameters, MT1 has large output power, low startstop cost and fuel cost, and high generation efficiency. It is thus mainly used to undertake basic load and remains operational in the 24 h period.
2) It is known from Table 1 that MT2 has small output power, high startstop cost and fuel cost, and low generation efficiency. It is thus used as a reserve set and is off during the whole studying period.
3) In the study, renewable energy power generation (e.g. WT) is used first. The use of temperature controlling devices increases renewable energy consumption without wind curtailment.
4) The leadacid battery is charged from 3:00–7:00 when there’s low load and discharged from 20:00–22:00 when the load is high.
5) Service life of the leadacid batter is closely related to the depth of charge and discharge. Figure 8 shows that the energy storage system charges and discharges frequently in the coming 24 h, indicating a significant loss of energy storage system life.
② Optimal economic operation of the microgrid with temperature adjustment
 1)
MT1 is mainly used to undertake basic load and keeps running in the scheduling period. However, the overall output decreases and becomes more stable in the scheduling period compared to that without temperature adjustment.
 2)
Similar to previous case, MT2 is used as a reserve set and remains off during the studying period.
 3)
Renewable energy power generation (e.g. WT) is used first. The use of temperature controlling devices increases renewable energy consumption, and wind energy can be fully absorbed in the microgrid.
 4)
The leadacid battery is charged from 3:00–5:00 during low load and discharged from 19:00–23:00 during high load.
 5)
Time series load in the coming 24 h is optimized according to the temperature control characteristics, leading to few charges and discharges, small power and depth of charge–discharge of the energy storage system.
Comparing Figs. 8 and 9, the case with temperature adjustment of temperature controlling devices achieves 8.63% lower system operating cost than that without temperature adjustment. Moreover, the charge–discharge cycles of leadacid battery decrease from 10 to 7 when temperature adjustment is enabled and the depth of charge–discharge also decreases, leading to increased service life of the energy storage system.
③ Effect of the allowed temperature adjustment range on operating cost
It can be known from Fig. 10 that increasing the allowed temperature adjustment range of the temperature controlling devices gradually decreases the operating costs in the scheduling period.This indicates that reasonable scheduling of temperature controlling devices can improve the economic efficiency of the microgrid.
④ Analysis of adjusted temperature of the temperature controlling devices
It can be observed from Fig. 11 that without temperature adjustment, the adjusted temperature increases continuously until reaching the peak and then becomes stable. The average adjusted indoor temperature in the coming 24 h reaches as high as 32.4 °C which well exceeds the comfort of residential users. In contrast, Fig. 12 shows that with temperature adjustment, the indoor temperature is within users’ comfort level, averaging at 24.4 °C.
7 Conclusions
This paper optimizes the time series output of temperature controlling devices through temperature adjustment by combining the dynamic variation law of adjusted temperature and power consumption, thus indirectly adjusting power load. An optimal economic operation model of microgrid is established, which takes the minimum sum of fuel cost, startstop cost, penalty for wind curtailment and cost of energy storage loss as the objective function. The model is solved by HPSO algorithm which is easytooperate, has high accuracy, and overcomes local optimum. An isolated community microgrid with heat pump is used in the case study and the heat pump properly participates in microgrid scheduling according to the temperature adjustment characteristics. The results show that temperature adjustment of temperature controlling devices can not only improve the economic efficiency of the microgrid, but also reduce charge–discharge cycles of the energy storage system and increase microgrid schedulability. In practical engineering applications, temperature controlling devices can adopt more complicated control strategies and realize minutebased scheduling of the microgrid which will be the key content of our future research.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51677011.
Authors’ contributions
BH carried out the model of the optimal economic of community microgrid incorporating temperature controlling devices and participated in the design of the study. HW participated in the design of the study, statistical analysis and drafting the manuscript. SY participated in the design of the study, statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors’ Affiliations
Reference
 Lu, Z., Wang, C., Mim, Y., Zhou, S., Lv, J., & Wang, Y. (2007). On the Research of Microgrid[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 31(19), 100–107.Google Scholar
 ISC Committee. (2003). IEEE standard for interconnecting distributed resources with electric power systems[J]. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
 Lasseter R, Akhil A, Marnay C, et al. The CERTS microgrid concept[J]. White paper for Transmission Reliability Program, Office of Power Technologies, US Department of Energy, 2002, 2(3):30. http://pserc.wisc.edu/documents/research_documents/certs_documents/certs_publications/certs_microgrid/certsmicrogridwhitepaper.pdf
 Lasseter R H, Paigi P. Microgrid: a conceptual solution[C]//Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2004. PESC 04. 2004 IEEE 35th Annual. IEEE, 2004, 6: 4285–4290Google Scholar
 Su, L., Zhang, J., Wang, L., Miao, W., & Wu, Z. (2010). Study on some key problems and technique related to microgrid [J]. Power System Protection and Control, 38(19), 235–239.Google Scholar
 Jin, P., Ai, X., & Xu, J. (2012). An Economic Operation Model for Isolated Microgrid Based on Sequence Operation Theory [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 32(25), 52–59.Google Scholar
 Xu Lizhong, Yang Guangya, Xu. Zhao, E. Al. Combined scheduling of electricity and heat in a microgrid with volatile wind power[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2011, 35(9): 53–60Google Scholar
 Niknam, T., Meymand, H. Z., & Mojarrad, H. D. (2011). A practical multiobjective PSO algorithm for optimal operation management of distribution network with regard to fuel cell power plants[J]. Renewable Energy, 36(5), 1529–1544.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Shen, Y., Hu, B., Xie, K., Xiang, B., & Wan, L. (2014). Optimal Economic Operation of Isolated Microgrid Considering Battery Life Loss [J]. Power System Technology, 38(09), 2371–2378.Google Scholar
 Li, Z., Zhang, F., Liang, J., Yun, Z., & Zhang, J. (2015). Optimization on Microgrid With Combined Heat and Power System [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 35(14), 3569–3576.Google Scholar
 Chen, J., Yang, X., Zhu, L., Zhang, M., & Li, Z. (2013). Microgrid Multiobjective Economic Dispatch Optimization [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 33(19), 57–66.Google Scholar
 Peng, C., Xie, P., Zhan, J., & Sun, H. (2014). Robust Economic Dispatch of Microgrid Using Improved Bacterial Foraging Algorithm [J]. Power System Technology, 38(09), 2392–2398.Google Scholar
 Wu, X., Wang, X., Wang, J., & Bie, Z. (2013). Economic Generation Scheduling of a Microgrid using Mixed integer programming [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 33(28), 1–9.Google Scholar
 Wang, R., Gu, W., & Wu, Z. (2011). Economic and Optimal Operation of a Combined Heat and Power Microgrid with Renewable Energy Resources[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 35(08), 22–27.Google Scholar
 Gu, W., Wu, Z., Bo, R., et al. (2014). Modeling, planning and optimal energy management of combined cooling, heating and power microgrid: A review[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 54(1), 26–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wu, X., Wang, X., Bie, Z., & Wang, J. (2013). Economic operation of microgrid with combined heat and power system[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 33(08), 1–6.Google Scholar
 Zhang, J., Cheng, H., Hu, Z., Ma, Z., Zhang, J., & Yao, L. (2009). Power System Probabilistic Production Simulation Including Wind Farms [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 29(28), 34–39.Google Scholar
 Guo, Y., Hu, B., Wan, L., Xie, K., Yang, H., & Shen, Y. (2015). Shortterm Economic Scheduling of CHP Microgrid Incorporating Heat Pump [J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 39(14), 16–22.Google Scholar
 Callaway, D. S., & Hiskens, I. A. (2011). Achieving controllability of electric loads[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(1), 184–199.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Katipamula S, L. N. Evaluation of residential HVAC control strategies for demand response programs[J]. Transactionsamerican society of heating refrigerating and air conditioning engineers, 2006, 112(1): 535.Google Scholar
 Lu, N. (2012). An evaluation of the HVAC load potential for providing load balancing service[J]. IEEE Transactions On Smart Grid, 3(3), 1263–1270.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kou, B., Yang, T., Zhang, X., Zhang, Q., Liu, W., & Ge, J. (2007). A New Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Based on Crossover and Mutation [J. Computer Engineering and Applications, 43(17), 85–88.Google Scholar